|
|
|
|
Location Location
Location
|
|
|
|
|
| Locality
is a key part of what makes a church a church.
The first part of this definition is clear from the meaning of
the word "church". The Greek word translated as church
in the New Testament is "ekklesia". An ekklesia is an
assembly or meeting. Its most common use was for the public
meeting of citizens, which governed most Roman cities. It refers
to a meeting and not to an organisation or building. Transferred
to a Christian situation, it means a group of believers in a
particular locality, who gather together on a regular basis.
The word ekklesia is derived from the Greek word for
"call". It follows that a Church is made up of people
who have been called and born again into the Kingdom of God. A
Church does not include everyone who lives in a locality, but only
those who are Christians. Only citizens could attend the city
council; in the same way only members of the Kingdom of God can
belong to a Church.
Locality is an essential part of the meaning of the word
ekklesia. So each Church should be attached to a particular
locality, and there can be as many Churches as there are different
localities. However, each locality should only have one Church. To
have a number of different kinds of church in the same locality is
inconsistent with the New Testament.
Difference in beliefs, leadership structure or worship style
cannot be reasons for different churches. Disagreements over these
things can only be a testimony to our lack of understanding of who
Jesus is and what he has done. He died to make us one. The
consequence of his death is that there is one faith, one hope, one
baptism, one body and one Spirit. The unity of the church in a
divided world should be proof of what Jesus has done. Therefore,
for a church to distinguish itself from other churches on the
basis of something connected with Jesus is an enormous
contradiction and a terrible sin. We need to get a revelation of
this truth. Difference in location is the only reason for having a
different church.
Location, Location, Location
A Church should be defined by its location. Difference in
location should be the only reason for a different church. Today
we have different churches for a whole variety of reasons; none of
them very valid. Different churches are based on theological
niceties, worship styles, personal loyalties or denominations.
People leave a church and go to another because they cannot get on
with someone. However, Jesus died to break down the barrier and
make his people one (Eph 2:14-18). If this is true, then
Christians should be able to live and work in unity. If Christians
can only get on with Christians whom they like, or who are similar
to them, they are no different from non-Christians.
Ideally, there should only be one church in each location as
illustrated above. If we live in Smith Street we are part of the
church that meets in Smith Street; we are part of the body there.
We do not have the option of belonging to the body somewhere else.
Modern churches are organised differently. The diagram below
shows the members of a church travelling to the Sunday meetings.
Some members live quite close, while others travel along way. When
we look at this from the point of view of the local church it does
not look too bad. It looks like a sun. |
|

|
| The
diagram below is a mess. It looks like the work of an infant who
has been let loose with a crayon and not like the creation of an
all wise God. It is the church from the point of view of a
non-Christian (NC); it is a mess. He sees a whole lot of churches.
They all look slightly different, but he cannot understand the
differences. To add to the confusion, some are the same. When he
looks at the Christians he comes into contact with, they are all
heading off in different directions. None of them go to the same
church. The red line represents one Christian who goes right
across town, passing four churches on the way. The squiggles
represent Christians who do not go into any church. From NC’s
point of view, there is no evidence of the unifying power of the
Jesus. |
|

|
| The
Christians who live close to NC have no impact in their own
location or community. They are always away at their church. Many
of them do not even know each other.
The picture above
is not complete. Each church only has a few lines. Imagine what it
would be like, if I put a line on for each Christian, the picture
would be a blur of lines. Looking at this, it is hard to claim
that we have a "ministry of reconciliation" (2 Cor
18,19). Yet this is how the world sees us. Are we really committed
to the "message or reconciliation"?
We need to get a
better understanding of how bad the body of Christ looks from the
outside. Pastors are often so focused on their own church, that
they lose this broader perspective. If we understood, how much of
mess the church looked from the outside, we would be much more
embarrassed about our differences and our disunity. We should be
ashamed of what we have created.
A crime of the
western church is that it has taken its divisions and
denominations and transplanted them into Africa, Asia and Latin
America, where they do not mean anything. The concept of an
Anglican Church (Church of England) in Africa should be seen as
bizarre. Yet this kind of thing is so common, it has become
acceptable.
In contrast, a
city in which all churches were based on locality, would look like
this. |
|

|
| All
the Christians that NC has contact with go to the same church,
which is in his location. He is aware that there are other
churches but they are similar to the one near where he lives.
Their only difference is that they are in different locations.
There should be no Christians who are not linked to the body of
Christ in their location.
Many readers will
now be saying, "This cannot work. It is not practical".
I understand that many Christians cannot go their local church,
because it does not provide spiritual protection or opportunity
for ministry. They need to go further afield to a church where
they can find these things.
I also understand
that in the modern world there is such a divergence between youth
culture and adult culture, that it is very difficult for people of
all ages to worship together. In some modern cities there may be a
need for youth orientated churches which can specialise in
reaching the youth of today.
However, these
situations are not God’s perfect will. He would much prefer our
unity was evident to the world. Therefore we should only establish
different churches on the basis of age, culture, ethnicity or
worship style where there is really no alternative.
The churches will
not be quite as distinct as in the diagram above. In reality,
there will be many lines between the churches, representing the
relationships between people. There will be strong relationships
between the people in one with church and the people in the one
next door. However, the lines will not be Christians driving past
another church. They will be commitment to one another. |
| Back
to What is a Church |
| |
| |
|